<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><metadata xml:lang="en">
<Esri>
<CreaDate>20240125</CreaDate>
<CreaTime>16144700</CreaTime>
<ArcGISFormat>1.0</ArcGISFormat>
<SyncOnce>TRUE</SyncOnce>
</Esri>
<dataIdInfo>
<idCitation>
<resTitle>Storm Water Strategic Flood Mitigation Alternatives</resTitle>
</idCitation>
<idAbs>The following were the weights used for each of the prioritization criteria:CriterionNameMetricsOriginal WeightUpdated WeightD1Structural Flooding - ModelStructural Flooding Reduction Score30%15%D3Capital ReplacementGIS – BRE15%5%D4Cost EfficiencyScore to Cost Ratio15%15%S1Road Flooding – ModelRoad Hazard Reduction Score30%15%T1Structural Flooding –Reported IncidentsGIS – Drainage complaints10%25%V1Road Flooding – Reported IncidentsGIS – High Water Rescues and Fatalities0%25%The scoring based on these metrics is added and sorted among all locations for ranking purposes. A low rank or a high score indicates high hazard.Contact person: Naven Kathuroju, Kiran Konduru</idAbs>
<idCredit>Freese and Nichols</idCredit>
</dataIdInfo>
</metadata>
